Did the US send an extra $6 billion to Ukraine by accident? (No.)

Introduction

Viral social media claims regarding the amount of US aid that has been sent to Ukraine continue to see popularity online. One of these narratives – popularized by figures such as Joe Rogan – alleges that the US mistakenly sent Ukraine an additional $6 billion in aid from 2022 to 2023.

This claim is untrue. In this article, we will explain how the error in fact was in the opposite direction: the US government has actually sent $6.2 billion less in military equipment to Ukraine than they’d initially calculated.

Viral claims

The claim that the U.S. government accidentally sent Ukraine an extra $6.2 billion in foreign aid was first spread in 2023, after it was revealed that the Pentagon had made an error in calculating the total aid that Ukraine had received.

Since then, social media posts and figures such as Joe Rogan have sparked outrage among their online following by claiming that the US sent Ukraine billions of dollars by mistake. As reported by AP Fact Check:

In a clip from the Sept. 7 episode of “The Joe Rogan Experience,” Rogan states that the U.S. “accidentally sent” $6 billion to Ukraine. Rogan made the comment during a conversation with former U.S. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard about the government’s response to the recent wildfires in Maui.

An example social media post from Twitter, posted June 2023:

What did the Pentagon actually reveal?

The social media posts were made following a June 2023 press briefing when then-Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Sabrina Singh described a miscalculation in the amount of military aid the Pentagon had given to Ukraine over the past two years.

“In a significant number of cases, services used replacement costs rather than net book value, thereby overestimating the value of the equipment drawn down from U.S. stocks and provided to Ukraine,” she said.

The aid in question was not budgetary support or transferred funds, but rather shipments of weapons and equipment to the Ukrainian military. As the Council on Foreign Relations explains, a portion of these are older weapons that come from existing US stockpiles.

A large share of the money in the aid bills has been spent in the United States, paying for U.S. factories and workers to produce weapons that are either shipped to Ukraine or used to replenish stocks of U.S. weapons the Pentagon has sent to Ukraine during the war.

Here’s How Much Aid the United States Has Sent Ukraine // Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), February 23, 2026

In order to accurately evaluate the value of donated military equipment from existing stockpiles, the equipment value’s depreciation with time needs to be accounted for. Depreciation refers to a decline in an item’s worth over time, due to deterioration or a loss in usefulness. An item’s original “sticker price” does not take this decrease in value into account, in contrast to its book value, which factors in the depreciation to calculate its worth.

Mark Cancian, a retired Marine colonel and senior adviser for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said using book value is the correct way to account for the equipment. The U.S. has been drawing down existing stocks of vehicles and munitions, he said, and their value depreciates just like a car or clothing a person might later donate.

What this means: When the Pentagon used the “sticker price” replacement value to calculate the amount of aid sent, this number was incorrect. It overestimated the value of the aid sent. In other words, the US had actually sent less aid to Ukraine than it had intended to – the opposite of what was claimed in the viral posts.

How does this affect the amount of US aid sent to Ukraine?

The “valuation errors,” as a Pentagon spokeswoman put it, will allow the Pentagon to send more weapons to Ukraine now before going to Congress to request more money.

How large was the discrepancy, and what time frame did it cover?

Singh said the amount of the overestimate totaled $6.2 billion across two fiscal years: “We have confirmed that for F.Y. ’23 the final calculation is $3.6 billion and for F.Y. ’22 it is $2.6 billion, for a combined total of $6.2 billion.”


Summary

Despite online attempts to shift the narrative, the reality is the opposite as what is being presented in these viral claims. No “accidental” extra money was sent to Ukraine, and the accounting error is not a sign of overspending or corruption. In reality, less support was given to Ukraine than previously indicated on paper, meaning that the $6.2 billion is aid that the administration is now authorized to send without having to wait on Congressional approval.

Related sources:

dummy-img

Trump Links Biden’s Ukraine Aid to Pentagon’s Iran War Funding Request

With the Pentagon potentially seeking a $200 billion supplemental package to fund the ongoing war with Iran, President Donald Trump defended that figure in part by saying U.S. ammunition “was taken down by giving so much to Ukraine.” He then exaggerated the amount of aid to Ukraine and falsely said that former President Joe Biden “didn’t rebuild anything” in the defense stockpile. Trump has a point that the military assistance provided to Ukraine reduced the U.S. reserve of weapons. But that aid largely has not affected the military operations in Iran, defense experts told us. Furthermore, Biden signed multiple spending bills passed by Congress that included funding to replace the older weapons that the U.S. gave to Ukraine with new items. Experts also told us that Biden’s administration put money into increasing the production of munitions for the military.
Fake: Missiles Meant for Ukraine Surface in Iranian Strikes on U.S., Israel

Fake: Missiles Meant for Ukraine Surface in Iranian Strikes on U.S., Israel

The claim does not appear on any of USA Today’s official platforms, and Parker Hempel, the ISW analyst cited in the video, has no record of making the statements attributed to him. Iran’s missile arsenal draws exclusively from Soviet and North Korean design lineages, and U.S.-manufactured systems are mechanically incompatible with Iranian launch infrastructure. The video is the latest iteration of a recurring disinformation narrative – the so-called “NATO weapons black market” – a claim that has been repeatedly investigated and never substantiated.
Here’s How Much Aid the United States Has Sent Ukraine

Here’s How Much Aid the United States Has Sent Ukraine

Eleven charts illustrate the extraordinary level of support the United States has provided Ukraine in recent years – though there has been no new U.S. aid legislation since 2024, and combined European aid tops U.S. contributions.
Fact check: 78 times Zelensky has expressed gratitude to the US

Fact check: 78 times Zelensky has expressed gratitude to the US

President Donald Trump claimed on social media on Sunday that “UKRAINE ‘LEADERSHIP’ HAS EXPRESSED ZERO GRATITUDE FOR OUR EFFORTS” in relation to the war there. Trump’s claim is not even close to accurate. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has expressed gratitude to the United States on dozens of occasions – 78 examples are listed below – since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of his country in early 2022. And Zelensky has repeatedly expressed gratitude to Trump personally since Trump was elected again last fall.
Fake: Zelensky Admits Tomahawk Terror Plot

Fake: Zelensky Admits Tomahawk Terror Plot

Amid ongoing talks among Western allies over providing Ukraine with U.S. Tomahawk long-range missiles, Russian propaganda escalated a disinformation campaign. Seeking to undermine a potential U.S. decision to supply advanced weaponry, Kremlin-linked media falsely claimed that President Volodymyr Zelensky had openly admitted to planning terrorist strikes inside Russia using American missiles. […] In reality, the Ukrainian president emphasized that any use of U.S.-supplied Tomahawk long-range cruise missiles would be strictly limited to military targets.
Fake: Bombs Dropped on Iran Were Intended For Ukraine – Zelensky | StopFake

Fake: Bombs Dropped on Iran Were Intended For Ukraine – Zelensky | StopFake

Ukraine’s President did not state that the bombs dropped on Iran on the night of June 22 were supposed to be used by Ukraine. Propaganda has spread a fake screenshot of a Radio Svoboda news story in another attempt to create the impression that the West no longer supports Ukraine.
Manipulation: Ukraine Left Without School Textbooks After Closure of USAID Program | StopFake

Manipulation: Ukraine Left Without School Textbooks After Closure of USAID Program | StopFake

The assertion that Ukraine has been left without school textbooks following the closure of a USAID program is a manipulation. In reality, the USAID program was implemented as planned, and textbook provision continues through funding from Ukraine’s state budget. Such disinformation is intended to sow panic and erode public trust in both Ukrainian authorities and international partners.
US President Trump’s claims about Zelenskyy and Ukraine fact-checked

US President Trump’s claims about Zelenskyy and Ukraine fact-checked

Claim: Zelenskyy started the war with Russia Claim: Zelenskyy is a dictator Claim: Zelenskyy has a 4 percent approval rating Claim: The US has spent $350bn to help Ukraine Claim: Zelenskyy said he doesn’t know where half of the money the US has given Ukraine went Claim: Zelenskyy was ‘sleeping and unavailable’ to meet Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last week in Kyiv
Video of Mark Rubio threatening to ‘cut off Ukraine’s Starlink access’ is edited

Video of Mark Rubio threatening to ‘cut off Ukraine’s Starlink access’ is edited

The Verdict: Fake. Comparing the original CNN video with the viral clip shows that AI audio was inserted to falsely portray Rubio threatening to cut Starlink to Ukraine.
Was Zelenskyy’s Pennsylvania visit ‘election interference’? Why experts say no

Was Zelenskyy’s Pennsylvania visit ‘election interference’? Why experts say no

On Sept. 22, 2024, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy visited a Scranton, Pennsylvania, ammunition plant to thank its workers, with Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro, who was a surrogate for vice president and then-Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. Legal experts said that doesn’t constitute “foreign election interference,” which typically includes “covert, fraudulent or deceptive acts.” Zelenskyy’s meeting with Shapiro was not a campaign event for either the governor or Harris.