What’s wrong with Amnesty International’s conclusions that “Ukrainian fighting tactics endanger civilians”

This is an embedded version of the original page.
Not all websites permit embedding. If it doesn't load, you can open it in a new tab.

Title: What’s wrong with Amnesty International’s conclusions that “Ukrainian fighting tactics endanger civilians”
URL: https://www.stopfake.org/en/what-s-wrong-with-amnesty-international-s-conclusions-that-ukrainian-fighting-tactics-endanger-civilians/
Publisher: StopFake.org
Date published: August 7, 2022
Description:

If Amnesty International had done the proper research, it might have found that the Ukrainian forces took all feasible measures to protect its population against the effects of hostilities while defending the population and territory against the crimes of the Russian forces, two leading experts on humanitarian law write.
International humanitarian law (IHL) is a body of law specifically designed to protect civilians and those who have laid down their arms. In sum, Amnesty International’s conclusions are short on facts and analysis and long on intemperate accusation.

Related Posts